CON-ARB AND MED-ARB IN LABOUR LAW: EVALUATING PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS IN TANZANIA AND SOUTH AFRICA
Abstract
This article evaluates the concepts of con-arb (conciliation-arbitration) and med-arb (mediation-arbitration) as dispute resolution mechanisms in labour law, with specific focus on their implications for procedural fairness in Tanzania. While con-arb is firmly established in South African labour jurisprudence, med-arb has likewise gained traction in comparative dispute resolution. Med-arb as a method of labour dispute resolution in Tanzania is mainly conducted under the Labour Institutions (Mediation and Arbitration) Rules G.N No. 64/2007 and the Labour Institutions Act Cap.300 R.E 2023. However, there are both legal and procedural challenges in its application.
In contrast, South Africa’s con-arb under the Labour Relations Act No. 66 of 1995 and the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings before the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration 2023 incorporates defined procedures, including objection rights, mandatory notice and application in certain disputes. The article points out that these gaps in Tanzania hinder fairness, predictability and efficiency in labour dispute resolution. It calls for legislative alignment between the principal and subsidiary laws, clearer procedural rules and strengthening of the CMA through resources, training and systematic documentation.
References
Published
Issue
Section
License
© Copyright
University of Nairobi Law Journal. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the University of Nairobi Law Journal.
The University of Nairobi Law Journal believes in the strength of due diligence exercised, that this work does not contain any material that is the subject of copyright held by another person. In the alternative, they believe that any protected pre-existing material that may be comprised in it has been used with appropriate authority or has been used in such circumstances that make such use permissible under the law.
Although every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this publication, supplements, updates and replacement material, the authors, editors, publishers and printers do not accept responsibility for any act, omission, loss, damage or the consequences thereof occasioned by a reliance by any person upon the contents hereof.
